June 2, 2026 - Bouncing Batteries
The Rome Planning Board spent most of its June 2 meeting on battery energy storage. Ultimately the board recommended that the Common Council adopt a six-month moratorium on new battery storage systems while the city writes rules for them into its code. The board attached a detailed wish list for what those rules should cover and suggested the council consider letting any project that already filed a completed application keep moving through review. So far there's only one. It is DLD Energy, whose CEO, Scott Aaronson, has proposed a system at 600 Canal Street. Mr. Aaronson asked not to be frozen out after spending tens of thousands of dollars on engineering and studies.
Three members of the Rome Youth Common Council, juniors at Rome Free Academy, drew praise for showing up to raise pointed safety questions. The board also reaffirmed the approved site plan for Copper Village, which is a large affordable-housing project planned for the south Rome waterfront. They also recommended approval of a planned development district for the Nascentia senior-housing community on the former Beeches site and approved a National Grid subdivision to make room for a gas regulator station. 190-foot Verizon cell tower was tabled until an independent engineering review is finished.
What happened at the meeting
The battery moratorium was the main event. A moratorium is a temporary freeze. The Common Council asked the planning board to weigh in on Ordinance 9869, which would stop new battery energy storage systems for six months so the city has time to put real rules on the books. This is the same approach Rome took with solar a few years ago. Right now the city code barely mentions these systems, which means there are almost no standards to hold a project to. The board recommended the council go ahead with the six-month pause and gave a list of what the eventual code should require. This includes fire suppression, gas detection, and climate control scaled to the size and type of battery; a "decommissioning bond" so the city isn't stuck paying to tear out and dispose of a system if the company walks away or goes bankrupt; clear rules for both standalone batteries and combined solar-plus-battery setups; and an exclusion for small home systems like a Tesla Powerwall, at which this is not aimed. The vote was 4–0, with one board member recusing.
One developer is already in line, and he asked the city not to freeze him out. Scott Aaronson, CEO of DLD Energy, told the board he filed a site plan for a battery system at 600 Canal Street, in an industrial stretch of the waterfront next to a metal-processing facility. He explained it's a "distribution-level" system designed to strengthen the local grid, not ship power downstate. The idea is to store electricity when it's cheap and demand is low, then push it back out during peak hours to help prevent brownouts and support the new manufacturing coming to Rome. Aaronson said he called the city before buying the property and was told battery storage was an allowed use, and he's already spent tens of thousands of dollars getting ready. His ask was narrow: if a moratorium passes, let projects that already submitted a completed application keep going through site review. The board was sympathetic but stressed the final call belongs to the council.
The Rome Youth Common Council showed up and came prepared. Three RFA juniors spoke during the public hearing on behalf of the city's youth council, walking through real concerns about lithium-ion batteries They had obviously done their research, mentioning topics like "thermal runaway,” toxic gases and runoff that could reach groundwater or the waste-treatment plant, how close a site would sit to homes and Bellamy Harbor Park, whether the fire department could reach and fight a battery fire, and how damaged batteries would be disposed of. Board members commended them, dug into the science alongside them, and urged them to bring their research directly to their own council members so it can shape the eventual legislation.
Copper Village got another year. The board unanimously reaffirmed the previously approved site plan for Copper Village, the affordable-housing development planned off Baptiste Avenue between South James Street and the Erie Canal. A site plan approval is good for one year and "reaffirming" it resets that clock. Copper Village is a large housing project of roughly 250 apartments and townhomes aimed at seniors and veterans. The developer needs more time to lock in construction financing. A representative said the old mobile home park on the site has been fully vacated and that the company expects to break ground in the third quarter of 2027, so it will likely return for at least one more extension before then.
The Nascentia senior community cleared the planning board. The board recommended that the Common Council approve a Residential Planned Development District at 7900–7902 Turin Road (the former Beeches property). Nascentia's plan is a gated community oriented toward residents 55 and up consisting of 34 duplex buildings, six single-family homes, and six six-unit buildings (about 110 homes total), with amenities. The flexibility the developer wants is mostly on spacing. The board recommended approval with two suggestions: add sidewalks on one side of the streets, and add sound buffering around the pickleball courts so the noise doesn't carry to homes on nearby Beach Street. The council makes the final decision.
National Grid can move ahead with a gas regulator station. The board approved a two-lot minor subdivision at 310–312 South James Street, near the Rome Senior Center. The move carves off a small piece of the property so National Grid can buy it and build a gas regulator station, which controls pressure in the gas lines. The board first issued a "negative declaration," meaning it found no significant environmental impact, then approved the split. National Grid will come back later for site plan and special-permit approval once the design is finished.
A 190-foot cell tower was put on hold. Tarpon Towers and Verizon want to build a 190-foot telecommunications tower at 6507 Lowell Road (State Route 26), on land owned by Cranesville Block Company in the city's industrial district. The tower would be built for "collocation," meaning other carriers like AT&T could share it instead of putting up their own. Nobody spoke at the public hearing. Board members raised questions about lighting, noise from the backup propane generator, and emergency access down the gravel drive. Rather than vote, the board tabled the environmental review and site plan until an independent engineer reviews the project. A decision is expected at the July 14 meeting.
One scheduling note. The board normally meets the first Tuesday of the month, but summer is shifting things. The July meeting moves to Tuesday, July 14, and the August meeting to Tuesday, August 11, to work around the Fourth of July holiday and tax grievance day at City Hall.